Banner
Home Fascicolo n.1/2020 Bibliografia
Bibliografia
Guanto robotico Gloreha Sinfonia: review degli studi recenti
pubblicato nel Gennaio - Febbraio 2020 ne Il Fisioterapista - fascicolo n.1

Bibliografia

  1. Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, et al. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014 Nov 12; (11): CD010820
  2. Tsu AP, Abrams GM, Byl NN. Poststroke upper limb recovery. Semin Neurol 2014; 34(5): 485-95.
  3. Knecht S, Hesse S, Oster P. Rehabilitation after stroke. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2011; 108(36): 600-6.
  4. Rizzolati G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Nuerosci 2004; 27: 169-92.
  5. Buccino G. Action observation treatment: a novel tool in neurorehabilitation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2014; 369(1644): 20130185.
  6. Sale P, Ceravolo M, Franceschini M. Action observation therapy in the subacute phase promotes dexterity recovery in right-hemisphere stroke patients. BioMed Research Int 2014; 2014: 457538.
  7. Winstein CJ, Rose DK, Tan SM, et al. A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: A pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85(4): 620-8.
  8. Salter RB. Continuous passive motion. From original to research to clinical applications. J Rheumatol 2004; 104: 14-9.
  9. Reinkensmeyer D, Galvez JA, Marchal L, Wolbrecht ET, Bobrow JE. Key problems for robot-assisted movement therapy research: a perspective from the University of California. Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR, 2007.
  10. Liepert J, Blauder H, Miltner W, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000; 31: 1210-6.
  11. Kim GY, Lim SY, Kim HJ, et al. Is robot-assisted therapy effective in upper extremity recovery in early stage stroke? —a systematic literature review. J Phys Ther Sci 2017; 29(6): 1108-12.
  12. Laver K, George S, Thomas S, Deutsch JE, Crotty M. Cochrane review: virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2012; 48(3): 523-30.
  13. Thieme H, Mehrholz L, Pohl M, Behrens J, Dohle C. Mirror Therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Sysr Rev. 2012 Mar 14; 3:CD008449.
  14. Sleimen-Malkoun R, Temprado JJ, Berton E. A dynamic systems approach to bimanual coordination in stroke: implications for rehabilitation and research. Medicina (Kaunas) 2010; 46(6): 374-81.
  15. Petioky J, Bissolotti L, Chioda B, Hoidekrova K. Effectiveness of upper limb training with Gloreha for stroke survivor with moderate to severe upper limb disability: a randomized controlled trial: preliminary results. Presented at 3rd Eureopean Stroke Organization Conference, 2017
  16. Vanoglio F, Bernocchi P, Mulè C, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of a robotic device for hand rehabilitation in hemiplegic stroke patients: a randomized pilot-controlled study. Clin Rehabil 2017; 31(3): 351-60.
  17. Varalta V, Picelli A, Fonte C, et al. Effects of contralesional robot-assisted hand training in patients with unilateral spatial neglect following stroke: a case series study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2014; 11: 160.
  18. Petioky J, Krásová J, Mikulenková P, Dojavová M. Robotic Glove with virtual reality biofeedback in spasticity management on acute and chronic patients with spastic hand paresis: impact on goal oriented functional therapy and routine mass therapy. Presented at the 20th ESPRM Congress 2016.
  19. Gastaldo M, Azzolin I, Campagnoli M, et al. Robot-assisted therapy integrated with virtual reality for rehabilitation of hand function after stroke: a clinical case study.  J Rehab Med; 47(54): 412.
  20. Gobbo M, Gaffurini P, Vacchi L, et al. Hand passive mobilization performed with robotic assistance: acute effects on upper limb perfusion and spasticity in stroke survivors. BioMed Research International Volume 2017, Article ID 2796815, 6 pages.
  21. Bissolotti L, Villafañe JU, Gaffurini P, et al. Changes in skeletal muscle perfusion on patients with post stroke hemiparesis treated by robotic assistance (Gloreha) of hand: a case series. J Phys Ther Sci 2016; 28(3): 769-73.
  22. Montecchi MG, Magnanini F, Tettamanzi S, et al. Is passive mobilization robot-assisted therapy effective in upper limb motor recovery in patient with acquired brain injury? A randomized crossover trial. International Journal of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Volume 2 (2016), Article ID 2: IJPTR-114, 5 pages.
  23. Hoidekrova K, Svestkova O. Effect of bimanual robotic assisted therapy to perform activities of daily living in patients after acquired brain injury: pilot study V. Kladruby Symposium on Interdisciplinary Neurorehabilitation.
  24. Kuo FL, Lee HC, Hsiao HY, Lin JC. The effects on hand function with robot-assisted rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy: a pilot study. International Journal of Medical and Health Sciences 2019; 13 (9).
  25. Tsuji T, Ota T, Kimura A, Chino N, Ishigami S. A study of inter-rater reliability of the modified ashworth scale (mas) in spasticity in patients with stroke. Japanese J Rehab Med; 2002 39(7): 409-15.
  26. Gabel C, Cuesta A. The Dash and Quick-Dash: based on consensus findings for internal consistency and factor structure – are they suitable and valid outcome measures for the upper limb? J Hand Therapy 2016; 29(3): 357-8.
  27. Petioky J, Krásová J, Mikulenková P, Dojavová M. Robotic Glove with virtual reality biofeedback in spasticity management on acute and chronic patients with spastic hand paresis: impact on goal oriented functional therapy and routine mass therapy. Presented at the 20th ESPRM Congress (2016).
  28. Vanoglio F, Bernocchi P, Mulè C, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of a robotic device for hand rehabilitation in hemiplegic stroke patients: a randomized pilot-controlled study. Clin Rehabil 2017; 31(3): 351-60.