Biomedical statistics & clinical epidemiology
STROBE Statement
published in January - February 2014 - in Il Fisioterapista - issue n.1

There are no translations available.


  1. Poorolajal J, Cheraghi Z, Irani AD, Rezaeian S. Quality of cohort studies reporting post the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) Statement. Epidemiol Health 2011; 33:e2011005.

  2. Glasziou P, Vandenbroucke JP, Chalmers I. Assessing the quality of research. BMJ 2004; 328(7430): 39-41.

  3. Black N. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. BMJ 1996; 312(7040): 1215-8.

  4. Papanikolaou PN, Christidi GD, Ioannidis JP. Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies. CMAJ 2006; 174(5): 635-41.

  5. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al. STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med 2007; 4(10): e296.

  6. Tooth L, Ware R, Bain C, Purdie DM, Dobson A. Quality of reporting of observational longitudinal research. Am J Epidemiol 2005; 161: 280-8.

  7. Da Costa BR, Cevallos M, Altman DG, Rutjes AW, Egger M. Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study. BMJ Open 2011; 1(1):e000048.

  8. Sanderson S, Tatt ID, Higgins JP. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. Int J Epidemiol 2007; 36(3): 666-76.

  9. Glasziou P, Meats E, Heneghan C, Shepperd S. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? BMJ 2008; 336(7659): 1472-4.

  10. Vandenbroucke JP, Von Elm E, Altman DG et al. STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2007; 4(10): e297.

There are no translations available.