Bibliografia

1. Poorolajal J, Cheraghi Z, Irani AD, Rezaeian S. Quality of cohort studies reporting post the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) Statement. Epidemiol Health 2011; 33:e2011005.

2. Glasziou P, Vandenbroucke JP, Chalmers I. Assessing the quality of research. BMJ 2004; 328(7430): 39-41.

3. Black N. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. BMJ 1996; 312(7040): 1215-8.

4. Papanikolaou PN, Christidi GD, Ioannidis JP. Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies. CMAJ 2006; 174(5): 635-41.

5. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al. STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med 2007; 4(10): e296.

6. Tooth L, Ware R, Bain C, Purdie DM, Dobson A. Quality of reporting of observational longitudinal research. Am J Epidemiol 2005; 161: 280-8.

7. Da Costa BR, Cevallos M, Altman DG, Rutjes AW, Egger M. Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study. BMJ Open 2011; 1(1):e000048.

8. Sanderson S, Tatt ID, Higgins JP. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. Int J Epidemiol 2007; 36(3): 666-76.

9. Glasziou P, Meats E, Heneghan C, Shepperd S. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? BMJ 2008; 336(7659): 1472-4.

10. Vandenbroucke JP, Von Elm E, Altman DG et al. STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2007; 4(10): e297.