Banner
References
Pain: its measurement in rehabilitation
published in September - October 2017 - in Il Fisioterapista - issue n.5

Bibliography

  1. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975; 1(3): 277-99.
  2. Caraceni A, Mendoza TR, Mencaglia E, et al. A validation study of an Italian version of the Brief Pain Inventory. Pain 1996; 65(1): 87-92.
  3. Caraceni A, Cherny N, Fainsinger R, et al. Pain measurement tools and methods in clinical research in palliative care. Recommendations of an expert working group of the european association of palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage 2002; 23: 239-55.
  4. Brunelli C, Zecca E, Martini C, et al. Comparison of numerical and verbal rating scales to measure pain exacerbations in patients with chronic cancer pain. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010; 8: 42.
  5. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM. What is the maximum number of levels needed in pain intensity measurement? Pain 1994; 58(3): 387-92.
  6. Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001; 94(2): 149-58.
  7. Grotle M, Brox JI, Vøllestad NK. Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29(21): E492-501.
  8. Paice JA1, Cohen FL. Validity of a verbally administered numeric rating scale to measure cancer pain intensity. Cancer Nurs 1997; 20(2): 88-93.
  9. Sze FK, Chung TK, Wong E, et al. Pain in Chinese cancer patients under palliative care. Palliat Med 1998; 12(4): 271-7.
  10. Ferreira-Valente MA1, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain 2011; 152(10): 2399-404.
  11. Chapman JR, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, et al. Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36(21 Suppl): S54-68.
  12. Farrar JT, Polomano RC, Berlin JA, Strom BL. A comparison of change in the 0-10 numeric rating scale to a pain relief scale and global medication performance scale in a short-term clinical trial of breakthrough pain intensity. Anesthesiology 2010; 112(6): 1464-72.
  13. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, et al. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008; 9(2):105-21.
  14. Maughan EF, Lewis JS. Outcome measures in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2010;19(9): 1484-94.
  15. Farrar J, Pritchett YL, Robinson M, Prakash A, Chappell A. The clinical importance of changes in the 0 to 10 numeric rating scale for worst, least, and average pain intensity: analyses of data from clinical trials of duloxetine in pain disorders. J Pain 2010; 11(2):109-18.
  16. Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C, Korsholm L, Grunnet-Nilsson N. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 82.
  17. Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, et al. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33(1): 90-4.
  18. Pagé MG, Katz J, Stinson J, et al. Validation of the numerical rating scale for pain intensity and unpleasantness in pediatric acute postoperative pain: sensitivity to change over time. J Pain 2012;13(4): 359-69.
  19. Merkel S, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, Malviya S. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs 1997; 23(3): 293-7.
  20. Nilsson S, Finnström B, Kokinsky E. The FLACC behavioral scale for procedural pain assessment in children aged 5-16 years. Paediatr Anaesth 2008; 18(8): 767-74.
  21. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Burke C, Merkel S, Tait AR. The revised FLACC observational pain tool: improved reliability and validity for pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment. Paediatr Anaesth 2006;16(3): 258-6
  22. Crosta QR, Ward TM, Walker AJ, Peters LM. A review of pain measures for hospitalized children with cognitive impairment. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 2014; 19(2): 109-18.
  23. Crellin DJ, Harrison D, Santamaria N, Babl FE. Systematic review of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability scale for assessing pain in infants and children: is it reliable, valid, and feasible for use? Pain 2015; 156(11): 2132-51.
  24. Voepel-Lewis T, Zanotti J, Dammeyer JA, Merkel S. Reliability and validity of the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability behavioral tool in assessing acute pain in critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care 2010; 19 (1): 55-61.
  25. Zwakhalen SM, Hamers JP, Abu-Saad HH, Berger MP. Pain in elderly people with severe dementia: a systematic review of behavioural pain assessment tools. BMC Geriatr 2006; 6:3.
  26. Mosele M, Inelmen EM, Toffanello ED, et al. Psychometric properties of the pain assessment in advanced dementia scale compared to self assessment of pain in elderly patients. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2012; 34 (1): 38-43.
  27. Liu JY, Briggs M, Closs SJ. The psychometric qualities of four observational pain tools (OPTs) for the assessment of pain in elderly people with osteoarthritic pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010; 40(4): 582-98.
  28. Leong IY, Chong MS, Gibson SJ. The use of a self-reported pain measure, a nurse-reported pain measure and the PAINAD in nursing home residents with moderate and severe dementia: a validation study. Age Ageing 2006; 35(3): 252-6.
  29. Warden V, Hurley AC, Volicer L. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) scale. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2003; 4(1): 9-15.
  30. Costardi D, Rozzini L, Costanzi C, et al. The Italian version of the pain assessment in advanced dementia (PAINAD) scale. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2007; 44(2): 175-80.
  31. Wood BM, Nicholas MK, Blyth F, Asghari A, Gibson S. Assessing pain in older people with persistent pain: the NRS is valid but only provides part of the picture. J Pain 2010; 11(12): 1259-66.
  32. Herr KA, Garand L. Assessment and measurement of pain in older adults. Clin Geriatr Med 2001; 17(3):457-78.
  33. Schnakers C, Chatelle C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, et al. The Nociception Coma Scale: a new tool to assess nociception in disorders of consciousness. Pain 2010; 148(2): 215-9.
  34. Sattin D, Pagani M, Covelli V, Giovannetti AM, Leonardi M. The Italian version of the Nociception Coma Scale. Int J Rehabil Res 2013; 36(2): 182-6.
  35. Riganello F, Cortese MD, Arcuri F, et al. A study of the reliability of the Nociception Coma Scale. Clin Rehabil 2015; 29(4): 388-93.
  36. Suraseranivongse S, Yuvapoositanont P, Srisakkrapikoop P, et al. A comparison of pain scales in patients with disorders of consciousness following craniotomy. Med Assoc Thai 2015; 98(7): 684-92.