Banner
Home Fascicolo n.4/2020 Bibliografia
Bibliografia
Comunicazione alternativa aumentativa nella grave cerebrolesione acquisita
pubblicato nel Luglio - Agosto 2020 ne Il Fisioterapista - fascicolo n.4

Bibliografia

  1. 3a Conferenza Nazionale di Consenso Buona Pratica Clinica nella Riabilitazione Ospedaliera delle persone con Gravi Cerebrolesioni Acquisite. Salsomaggiore, 5-6 novembre 2010.
  2. Hagen C. Levels of cognitive functioning. Communication Disorders Service, Rancho Los Amigos Hospital, 1998.
  3. Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 2002; 58(3): 349-53.
  4. Dongilli PA, Hakel ME, Beukelman DR. Recovery of functional speech following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1992; 7(2): 91-101.
  5. Bauer G, Gestenbrand F, Rumpl E. Varieties of the locked-in syndrome. J Neurol 1979; 221(2): 77-91.
  6. León-Carrión J, van Eeckhout P, Domínguez-Morales Mdel R. The locked-in syndrome: a syndrome looking for a therapy. Brain Inj 2002 ;16(7): 555-69.
  7. Un General Assembly, Universal declaration of human rights, 10 December 1948, 217° (III). http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3712c.htlm. Ultima visita 23 marzo 2020.
  8. WHO, Patients’ rights, 2018. http: //www.who.int/genomics public/patientrights/en/. Consultato il 23 marzo 2020.
  9. Hill K. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) Research and Development: The Challenge of Evidence-based Practice International. Journal of Computer Processing Of Languages 2006; 19(04): 249-62.
  10. Hill K. Advanced in augmentative and alternative communication as quality-life technology. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2010; 21: 43-58.
  11. Schreuder M, Riccio A, Risetti M, et al. User-centered design in brain-computer interfaces- A case study. Artif Intel Med 2013; 59 (2):71-80.
  12. Vansteensel MJ, Pels egm, Bleichner MG, et al. Fully implanted brain-computer interface in locked-in patient with ALS. N Engl J Med 2016; 375(21): 2060-6.
  13. Chaudhary U, Mrachacz-Kersting N, Birbaumer N. Neuropsychological and neurophysiological aspects of brain‐computer‐interface (BCI)‐control in paralysis. J Physiol 2020; [Epub ahead of print].
  14. Riccio A, Pichiorri F, Schettini F, et al. Interfacing brain with computer to improve communication and rehabilitation after brain damage. Prog Brain Res 2016; 228: 357-87.
  15. Peters B, Bieker G, Heckman SM, et al. Brain-computer interface users speak up: the Virtual Users' Forum at the 2013 International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015; 96(3 0): S33-7.
  16. Fox L, Sohlberg MM Meaningful Roles. In: Beukelman D, Yorkston KM, Reichle J (eds). Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired neurological disorders. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co, 2000; pag. 3-24.
  17. Togher L, Wiseman-Hakes C. INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part iv: cognitive communication. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2018; 29(4): 353-68.
  18. Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O'Reilly MF, et al. Helping people in a minimally conscious state develop responding and stimulation control through a microswitch-aided program. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2017; 53(3): 433-40.
  19. Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O'Reilly MF, et al. Technology-aided programs for post-coma patients emerged from or in a minimally conscious state. Front Hum Neurosci 2014; 8: 931.
  20. Fager S, Hux K,Beukelman D, Karantounis R. Augmentative and alternative communication use and acceptance by adults with traumatic brain injury. Augment Altern Commun 2006; 22: 37-47.
  21. Brunner M, Hemsley B, Togher L, Palmer S. Technology and its role in rehabilitation for people with cognitive-communication disability following a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Brain Inj 2017; 31(8): 1028-43.
  22. Fried-Oken M, Beukelman D, HUX K. Current and future AAC research considerations for adults with acquired cognitive and communication impairment. Assist Technol 2011; 24(1): 56-66.
  23. Paterson H, Carpenter C. Using different methods to communicate: how adults with severe acquired communication difficulties make decisions about the communication methods they use and how they experience them. Disabil Rehab 2015; 37(17): 1522-30.
  24. Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Update review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92(4): 519-30.
  25. Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Improving attention and managing attentional problems. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2001; 31: 359-75.
  26. Thistle JJ, Wilkinson KM. Working Memory demands of aided augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with developmental disabilities. Augment Altern Commun 2013; 29(3): 235-45.
  27. Rousseaux M, Castelnot E, Rigaux P, Kozlowski O, Danzè F. Evidence of persisting cognitive impairment in a case series of patients with locked-in syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80: 166-70.
  28. Trojano L, Moretta P, Cozzolino A, Saltalamacchia A, Estraneo A. Cognitive rehabilitation in non-communicative brain-damaged patients. Funct Neurol 2011; 26(1): 55-59.
  29. Poletti B, Carelli L, Solca F, et al . An eye-tracking controlled neuropsychological battery for cognitive assessment in neurological diseases. Neurol Sci 2017; 38(4): 595-603.
  30. World Health Organization (WHO). 2001 International classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/ classifications/icf/en/. Ultima visita 23 marzo 2020.