Bibliografia

1. Higgins et al. 2008
2. Moher D, Jadad AR, Nichol G, et al. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. Control Clin Trials 1995; 16: 62-73.
3. Khan KS et al. Undertaking systematic reviews of research effectiveness: crd’s guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York; 2001:1–20. CRD Report 4.
4. Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA, et al. The Delphi List: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi Consensus. J Clin Epidemiol 1998 ; 51(12): 1235-41.
5. Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M. Reliability of the PEDroscale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 2003; 83: 713-21.

Testi di riferimento

• Bondemark L, Ruf S. Randomized controlled trial: the gold standard or an un obtainable fallacy? European Journal of Orthodontics 2015; 1-5.
• de Morton N A. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study, Aust J Physiother 2009; 55(2): 129-33.
• Milanese S. The use of RCT in manual therapy – Are we trying to fit a round peg into a square hole? Manual Therapy 2011; 16: 403-5.
• Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG.. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomised trials. Lancet 2001; 357(9263):1191-4
• Olivo SA, Macedo LG, Gadotti IC, et al. A Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 2008; 88:156-75.
• Sackett D, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996; 312(7023): 71-2.
• Schultz K, Altman DG, Moher D; per il CONSORT Group. Consort statement 2010 : linee guida aggiornate per il reporting di trial randomizzati a gruppi paralleli. Evidence 2012; 4(7):
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 3rd ed. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 2003.
• Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA, Boers M, van den Brandt PA. The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54: 651-4.